What Happens After You Die?

Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 5/05/2009 8:50 am
If you’re good you go up... if you’re bad you go down.  That's the basic way many of us would describe the concepts of Heaven and Hell in a religious context.

Heaven and Hell have both fascinated and perplexed mankind for centuries.  Tonight on Local 12, we are to examining the different facets of the afterlife and how different religions approach the subject.

On Local 12 at 6 p.m., we examined the mystery of Heaven: 

A new movie is coming out soon called Angels and Demons. It's a follow-up to the highly successful Da Vinci Code. The concept of angels and demons, or perhaps more broadly, of heaven and hell, has both fascinated and perplexed mankind for thousands of years.

Local 12 Reporter Jeff Hirsh takes a look at images of the after life:

To millions, it is the ultimate either or question. Heaven...

"Our soul, the essence of what makes me me, and you you, and the viewers themselves, that is an eternal part of God."

Or hell...

"The church has always said there is a reality called hell."

Although to some, it's not either or ... it's neither:

"I'm with American Atheists. I'm national legal director for American Atheists. I do not believe in the idea of heaven or hell."

Most Americans, however, do believe in some sort of life beyond the grave. A recent Harris poll, for example, found 71 percent believe there is a heaven ... 62 percent believe in hell ...and that's nothing new.

Jeff Hirsh: "The idea of an afterlife predates the Judeo Christian era. For example, the ancient pharaohs in the pyramids and the early Native Americans buried not far from here in Fort Ancient, all were buried with worldly possessions to take to the next existence. But that existence was neither good nor bad. It just was... The concept of heaven evolved with the growth of judaism, Christianity, and Islam. The worship of one god, included a personal relationship with God ... following God's commandments ... living a good and faithful life.

Rabbi Ken Kanter, Hebrew Union College: "We talk of heaven and hell in worship. It's an understanding of what you get because you've been good versus what you get if you've not been good."

"We all have the hope, we all hope we get to heaven."

But is heaven a physical place ... up in the clouds ... or simply a spiritual place ...assuming you believe in heaven? Christian art from the middle ages is the image many still have today, although a more modern view in some faiths unites the soul with God.

Fr. Rob Jack. Mt. St. Mary's Seminary: "Heaven is God himself, the father, son, and holy spirit, this communication of love of the three persons together, and where you find happiness and joy and the constant presence of this ever creative love."

Of course, there are differences between faiths and even within faiths. Orthodox Jews, for example, believe in physical resurrection. But that's not part of the Reform Jewish tradition. And while Catholics believe in purgatory, other Christian faiths do not. And then there are those who reject it all.

Edwin Kagan of American Atheists says it's all a myth, trying to answer the un-answerable.
 
"As an atheist, I believe in life before death, not life after death."

But most Americans do accept some sort of heaven ... physical or spiritual ... but attainable:
 
"Can a non believer go to heaven, even if he or she doesn't believe there is a heaven? Well, that's up to God."

And, perhaps, up to the individual as well. If you live a good life, you will be remembered long after you're gone.
 
"And that's about as heavenly as you can get for anybody."

Later, on Local 12 at 11 p.m., Jeff Hirsh looked at hell, from the perspective of different religious denominations, and talked to a man who says he's been there.

We've all heard the expression "hotter than hell". It's an image which, visually at least, dates to Christian artwork of the middle ages when portrayals of the after-life went to the canvas. Tortured souls ... the devil ... a miserable eternity.

Fr. Rob Jack of St. Mary's Seminary: "Of course anything dark was always where the fire was and you always went below the earth and you suffered the torments of hell, and because of the lightness of the sky and the beauty, heaven was above. That's where God was."

But if the image of heaven was based on faith and belief, the image of hell was based on a real location ... Gehenna or in hebrew: "Gei Henom. The Valley of Henom. It's a place you can visit today."
 
And today, the place looks pretty nice. But in ancient times, it was ugly, where children were sacrificed to pagan gods: "And obviously our ancient forebearers said that was the worst thing they could imagine, child sacrifice throwing babies to gods."

"Gehenna was their description of a garbage dump outside of Jerusalem which at one time was a place of child sacrifice."

Rabbi Ken Kanter of Hebrew Union College: "At the same time the valley was a dump, literally a dump where refuse and garbage was thrown,so it must have smelled something awful. That was about as bad as it could get."
 
"So when they tried to communicate if you're not faithful to the law this is the kind of life you're gonna lead."
 
"So Gehenna or Gei Henom, the Valley of Death, was really the place called Gei Henom. JEFF "So that's the image of hell is burning?" Rabbi Kanter: "Yes."

Ironically, even though the image dates to ancient Jerusalem, burning in hell is not part of Judaism. An unrewarded after-life ...yes, if you deserve it. But not the way hell is seen in many other denominations: "So the concept of Satan as evil incarnate is not a Jewish tradition."

But Satan is a big part of some other faiths to the point that some who claim near-death experiences say hell is a lot like it's portrayed in that artwork from a thousand years ago. A dozen years ago, a then-Norwood pastor made national news saying died and went to hell: Rev. Howard Storm: "In desperation in that place, I remembered the faith I had as a little child, going to church and called up for Jesus to save me, and my experience was that he came and took me out of that place."

Reverend Storm says he then went to heaven but was sent back to earth to "Get it right."

Non-believers, though, like Edwin Kagin scratch their heads. Kagin, of Northern Kentucky, is the National Legal Director for American Atheists: "There are people who claim visions or being transported to heaven or hell and are returned. There are also people who claim to have been on flying saucers."
 
Even the faithful may find near-death stories hard to swallow. But a recent Harris Poll shows about two thirds of Americans do believe in hell.

As for Gei Henom ... where hell's burning image was created ... well even in the Middle East, it has snowed there. So maybe, hot or not, hell can freeze over.

We're also curious about your beliefs.  Do you believe in Heaven and Hell? What are they like?  Vote in our polls and click on "Add comment" to tell us about your views.
Share
112 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of WKRC-TV :: Cincinnati Weather and Forecasts, Cincinnati News, Breaking News, and Sports for the Cincinnati area, Ohio, northern Kentucky, Indiana, and the tristate area

anne34 - 5/13/2009 2:27 PM
0 Votes
Look at it this way: If you do not believe, and you die and find there is a Heaven, you have lost, because there will surely also be a Hell. So if you do believe and you die and find nothing, you have lost nothing. Be Prepared!

ChuckITGuy - 5/13/2009 12:49 AM
0 Votes
Sandi... Amen! AlaskanInOhio

Mayberry - 5/10/2009 11:49 AM
1 Vote
As people age, some things are accepted on FAITH alone! With the Belief in God,Christ those who truly Believe never feel totally Alone. Even those who doubt seem to be calling upon the Lord in times of great need. Just leave science out of it and BElIEVE. Just "Let go and Let God". You might get a good night's sleep after having said your Prayers.

madamezora - 5/8/2009 5:31 PM
1 Vote
Religions not only claim to answer what they cannot rightly do, but they have also been a means by which leaders can control a given population. Heaven and hell are irrelevant ideas dangled before us by unscrupulous men- we're better than fairly-tale mythologies. Now if only we were smarter.

Jim Schu - 5/8/2009 2:27 PM
2 Votes
Unfocused. 1 of 3. Why do liberals ‘make-up’ terms and facts on the spot? LMAO. To your credit you state that that was wrong. Also to your credit, and contrary to the vast majority of liberals, you do address questions. However, true to liberal form, you continue to misstate the argument. Please show me my post where I claimed that the Babylonian Empire, the Medo-Persian Empire, the Greek Empire, or the Roman Empire were monotheistic societies. The only one that made that claim was you when you stated that the Roman Empire was a monotheistic society (Catholic) when it fell (It was, actually, a polytheistic society when it fell). I have already corrected you on this! Why are you having such difficulty comprehending this? Let’s review, YOU stated that there were fewer liberals in the past. I listed those empires that all fell, in part, due to liberal ideology. You then made the claim that all of those empires predated ‘monotheistic history’. I proved that all those empires existed AFTER the nation of Israel (a monotheistic society). Please pay attention here. I NEVER CLAIMED THAT THOSE EMPIRES WERE MONOTHEISTIC SOCIETIES! Sorry, I did not mean to perplex you with my use of the word ‘secular’, however it would be inappropriate to use your terms ‘real’ or ‘actual’ history. We should be precise in what we say. The Bible is a history of God’s chosen people. Adam and Eve are mentioned in that history; therefore they are historical figures. Is this history ‘real’ or ‘actual’? Most of the historical facts in the Bible have been thoroughly investigated and found to be ‘true’, therefore those facts have been included in our ‘secular’ history. We have not found evidence to prove the existence of Adam and Eve; therefore they are NOT included in our secular history. As it stands they are ‘real’ individuals in Biblical history but they are not listed in secular history. I should add that no one has ever proven the Bible to be inaccurate.

Jim Schu - 5/8/2009 2:26 PM
2 Votes
2 of 3. . You do seem to have a good grasp of the scientific process. You are absolutely correct that science makes observations, forms a hypothesis, and conducts experiments to prove or disprove the hypothesis. Science must remain precise, tedious, and unbiased! All conclusions must be verified with repeatable, consistent results. So when did they conduct experiments to prove that ‘LIFE comes from goop’? (You may be tempted to cite the amino acid experiments. That merely proves that amino acids come from goop). So how can we arbitrarily change ‘Life comes from life’ to ‘Modern Life comes from life’? How quickly we abandon Scientific Method when trying to force the evidence to support our ‘desired’ conclusions. So, are you a supporter of Scientific Process or of arbitrarily redefining established laws without due process? Regarding your idiotic and insulting remark that I subscribe to ‘Intelligent Design’ I must question what you know about the subject. The pseudo-intellects that came up with this ‘theory’ (?) believe that the earth and universe are merely 6,000 years old. They claim that God created the light from the stars (in route to earth, no less) BEFORE He created the stars! They claim that the water for the flood came from an ice sphere that enveloped the earth. They believe that the mountains rose with the floodwaters and SOMEHOW managed to hold fossils during this rapid ascent. They believe that the Grand Canyon was formed in days or weeks. They think that dinosaurs coexisted with man. (They must view the Fintstone’s cartoons as documentaries). They consistently ignore known and established scientific fact to advance their ridiculous and unproven ‘claims’. (That would be like arbitrarily rewording Scientific Laws to suit our needs). They attach the label ‘science’ here in a lame attempt to get their garbage in our classrooms. If the only two choices here were Evolution or Intelligent Design, I would be an evolutionist!

Jim Schu - 5/8/2009 2:26 PM
2 Votes
3 of 3. . Your beliefs about the parts of the eye are incorrect. The complex eye is USELESS without all the parts in place. These parts MUST have evolved separately (one mutation per generation). What useful purpose does the retina serve without rods and cones? What useful purpose do rods and cones serve without the photosensitive chemical rhodopsin? What useful purpose does the vitreous humor serve without the macula? What useful purpose does melanin serve without a retina? What useful purpose do the chemicals in cones (called ‘color pigments’) serve without sight? What useful purpose does any part of the eye serve without an optic nerve? What useful purpose does the optic nerve serve without a primary visual cortex? Assuming evolution was ‘intelligent’ enough to save all these USELESS mutations and pass them on from one generation to the next (for countless generations) until all the necessary pieces were acquired, the question must be asked, WHO programmed the brain to interpret these chemically induced electrical impulses into vision? (Evolutionary ‘Trial and Error’?) You can hook-up the most expensive video camera to a supercomputer but, until man writes the software to tell the computer HOW TO INTERPRET all those 1’s and 0’s, the camera is merely a useless appendage to the computer. As I’ve stated before, I lack the faith that is required to believe in a branch of science that creates more questions then it answers. I choose to believe in a book that, so far, has NEVER BEEN PROVEN WRONG! If you are comfortable with your belief here, that is, obviously, your business. Anyway, I am glad we had this opportunity to discuss our differences of ‘opinion’ and to clarify the ‘facts’ of the matter. Hopefully we have both gained from this exchange. I sincerely hope you question your faith as thoroughly as I have mine. May our Great Ancestral Monkey Bless us all.

adam156 - 5/8/2009 12:46 AM
0 Votes
This is a wonderful opinion. The things mentioned are unanimous and needs to be appreciated by everyone.I appreciate the concern which is been rose. The things need to be sorted out because it is about the individual but it can be with everyone.A very smart and diplomatic answer. It’s really appreciable and general. Adam Brown [url=http://www.legalx.net]Attorney Directory[/url]

unfocusedpie - 5/8/2009 12:39 AM
1 Vote
Please try to find even a SINGLE scientific paper that supports your views about evolution violating the 2nd law of thermodynamics. I guarantee you won't find one. I suppose it's all a big conspiracy among scientists to try to hide the truth right? It's late and I'm really done arguing with you. The simple truth is that I have all of science on my side, and you have nothing but a 2000 year old book on yours. Have a nice day.

unfocusedpie - 5/8/2009 12:28 AM
1 Vote
I made up the term "monotheistic history" on the spot as I wrote it. I admit I was mistaken to do this. It does not change the fact that it was a misunderstanding of words. However, this doesn't change the fact that almost any of the empires you listed have almost anything to do with monotheism. Just because a single monotheistic small society (the Jews) existed at the end of some of these empires does not include these empires in monotheistic history. Your constant use of the words "Secular history" perplexes me. Are you saying that there is more than one kind of history? I'm only aware of one kind, the real kind. If you don't think Adam and Eve are part of real history then we have no disagreement here. If you DO think that Adam and Eve are part of real ACTUAL history then what I said stands. Your statements about the Law of Biogenesis just goes to show your lack of understanding of the scientific process. Pasteur did great work for his time, but like all theories, they evolve over time to take into account new scientific evidence. That's how science works. All Pasteur proved is that that maggots don't magically appear out of nowhere. He had no way of proving that no life comes from non-life. It is impossible to prove such a broad statement. It in no way proved anything about life not being able to originate from non life at any point in the history of this planet. I pretty well explained why this is the case but you chose to ignore that part I guess. My statements about Intelligent Design apply directly to you whether you choose to use the words "intelligent design" or not. You believe that god created life do you not? Also you seem to completely miss the point of my explanation about the evolution of the eye. None of the parts of the eye you list have to evolve at the same time. Each is it's own step with it's own usefulness.
Get LOCAL 12 On Your Mobile Device
Get the LOCAL 12 app on your iPhone or your Android mobile phone.
Just open your QR barcode reader/scanner app on your phone, place the scanner over the appropriate image below and it will take you to download the app!

Android Phone app

Download LOCAL 12 Android app

iPhone app

Download LOCAL 12 app for iPhone

iPhone and iPod touch app
Catch the latest news, weather and sports on your iPhone or iPod touch with the Mobile Local News app.
WAP site
Our Web site is specially designed for all mobile phone users to read the latest news, sports, weather and even watch videos.
Stay connected on-the-go with our mobile Web site. It’s free
News Over Wireless
When you're on the go, take the news with you.
Get continually updated news, sports, entertainment, and weather - including maps, radar and Five-day forecasts - on your cell phone.
LOCAL 12
WKRC-TV
1906 Highland Avenue
Cincinnati, OH 45219
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.