Cancer Survivor Permitted To Swim Topless

Jodi Jaecks (CBS News)
Jodi Jaecks (CBS News)
Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 6/22/2012 10:25 am
(AP) SEATTLE - A Seattle breast cancer survivor whose breasts were surgically removed has gained the permission to swim topless at a city pool. But Jodi Jaecks wants to make sure her privilege is also extended to other breast cancer survivors who want to swim comfortably.

"Initially when I heard about the reversal, I was elevated. Then it came that it wasn't a policy change, it was just an exception for me. Then I was quite deflated. It seemed like it was a reaction that it was just meant to appease me," the 47-year-old said Thursday.

On Wednesday, Seattle Parks and Recreation Superintendent Christopher Williams announced he was giving Jaecks an exception to the department's clothing policy.

"Our original concern stems from our responsibility to accommodate the needs of all our patrons. In this case, I see nothing that might alarm the public," Williams said in a statement. He was reacting to an article about Jaecks that was published in The Stranger weekly newspaper, which also ran a picture of her topless.

Williams said that he will review on a case-by-case basis requests from people who have had surgery and want to swim.

After enduring two surgeries, rounds of chemotherapy and the surgical removal of both her breasts in March 2011, Jaecks wanted to turn to swimming to regain her strength. But swimsuit tops proved too uncomfortable and nerves on her chest remained tender, Jaecks said.

So she asked the manager at her city pool if she could swim topless earlier this year. Eventually, she heard from the head of the aquatics department, who told her she couldn't.  "And that's when they said it was a policy that they required gender-appropriate clothing ... regardless if I had nipples or whatever," Jaecks said.

Jaecks hasn't swum topless yet. She is planning a swim on Monday. Her exception extends only to adult lap hours.

She plans to meet with Williams next week and ask that her exception be extended to anyone who survived breast cancer.  Jaecks said cancer patients shouldn't be made to feel self-conscious by asking for special permission.

Share
33 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of WKRC-TV :: Cincinnati Weather and Forecasts, Cincinnati News, Breaking News, and Sports for the Cincinnati area, Ohio, northern Kentucky, Indiana, and the tristate area

Jim Schu - 6/26/2012 10:13 PM
0 Votes
1excincy. We agree it takes “common sense”, but… that’s not really stating a position, is it? Perhaps you are correct that “the Lord gave some of us too much credit”, but again, that’s not really saying anything. Your concluding remark seems to indicate you agree that “believers” should not FORCE (personally or through governmental agencies) their beliefs upon others. (Yet I have my reservations that that was your intention). ‘8^)

1excincy - 6/26/2012 8:41 AM
0 Votes
Jim - it can all be summed up in two words - common sense. Maybe the Lord gave some of us too much credit. And as far as imposing a penalty for non-compliance, these verses are for believers.

Jim Schu - 6/25/2012 4:02 PM
0 Votes
CJCincy3772. I am impressed that you read more than merely the one verse I quoted. Kudos to you! I believe the verse you are referring to is 1 Timothy 2:9 which states, “In like manner also, that women ADORN themselves in MODEST APPAREL, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly ARRAY.” (KJV, Emphasis mine). You claim modesty “means pretty much for a woman to not expose her breasts or bottom”. Does it or is that a deep-seated prejudice we are raised to believe? The English word modest can mean: 1. Humble; 2. Shy; 3. Reasonable; 4. Simple; or 5. Not overtly sexual. (Interesting fact - the fifth meaning is a modern definition and, therefore, not applicable to this discussion. (See 1828 online dictionary)). So which was Paul’s meaning? Paul used the Greek word, “Kosmios”, (translated as “modest”). According to Stong this word means, “orderly or decorous”. Paul also used the word “Kosmeo” (translated as “adorn”), which means, “to put in proper order, that is, decorate, (adorn, garnish, trim)”. Finally, the context of the verse clarifies Paul’s meaning. “Not with broided hair”, (fancy hairdos); “or gold or pearls”, (flashy jewelry); “or costly array”, (lavish clothing). I read nothing here regarding covering the breasts (or ANY other body part). 1 of 2. (Continued).

Jim Schu - 6/25/2012 4:01 PM
0 Votes
2 of 2. The word “apparel” used in this verse is translated from the Greek “Katastole” which means “a deposit, that is, costume”. Oddly enough this is the ONLY occurrence in the Bible of this Greek word. The common Greek words for clothing are “Himation” (used 61 times in the New Testament) and “Himatiamos” (used 6 times in the New Testament including this verse translated as “array”). With this understanding it becomes clear that Paul’s use of the word modest (Kosimios) should be defined as “reasonable and simple” and his subject is not women’s clothing (Himation) but rather her adornments (Kosmeo), that is her jewelry, hairdos, baubles, trinkets, etc. I agree with you that “believers” should dress modestly (however you wish to interpret that). Regardless of the meaning we wish to infer on this verse does the Bible instruct “believers” to enforce this dress code on non-believers? If so, what penalty is listed for non-compliance? More importantly, is dress code enforcement a legitimate role for government?

1excincy - 6/25/2012 12:18 PM
2 Votes
Just an fyi - I Timothy talks about dressing with modesty. I don't think going topless can ever be considered modest.

bcatz - 6/24/2012 9:36 PM
0 Votes
CJCincy, Once a man told me he is a man and supposed to be the head of the household and I, a woman, was to obey him, according to the bible. I told this man, fine, we'll go by that just as soon as he obeys everything else the bible says for him to do and not to do. A person can't pick and choose to their satisfaction, which biblical laws they want to follow. If a person can't follow all the laws, don't expect someone else to follow what pleases you. IT DON'T WORK LIKE THAT!

CJCincy3772 - 6/24/2012 8:54 PM
0 Votes
Jim: read some more in 1 Tim -- I do believe it is written that a woman should dress modesty -- which means pretty much for a woman to not expose her breasts or bottom. If she wants to strengthen her upper muscles, I think lifting weights would do the trick. Besides that, I wonder how she dresses the rest of the time when she is not swimming topless.

bcatz - 6/24/2012 10:03 AM
0 Votes
I would say morals are of God, and criminal is of man. If man mixes the two, then man has to decide. Murder is wrong by God and Man, so sometimes they mix anyway. I don't know the answer. I say follow Gods Laws and you won't break any of mans laws. Except where man can make money! :)

Jim Schu - 6/24/2012 9:53 AM
2 Votes
CJCincy3772, sorry, I cannot find any reference in the Bible that indicates this behavior (swimming topless) is wrong. If you are aware of any such verses I will be happy to consider them. I do know that Adam and Eve were naked in the Garden of Eden until they ate of the forbidden fruit and decided for themselves that nudity was something to be ashamed of. (Please note that was MAN’S determination and not a decree from God). I agree with you that this woman has some issues and, perhaps, even an agenda. Where I differentiate from you and all the others is in HOW we deal with it. In my opinion we should live our lives according to our own beliefs and conscious. We should raise our children by our values and convictions and we should be an example to our neighbors by how we live our lives! (1 Timothy 4:12). The government is not now, has never been, nor ever will be MY Moral Compass! I hope it is not yours.

Jim Schu - 6/24/2012 9:32 AM
1 Vote
Chenoosesmom, there is not one thought in your last comment I dispute with the POSSIBLE exception of: “my comment has nothing to do with Christianity”. I agree with your assessment that she lacks common decency and common sense. Shall we make it a crime to lack common sense or common decency? Our Founders claimed that our form of government was only for a moral and religious people. Why? Because while the government ALLOWED all behavior, provided it did not harm others, it was our morality (NOT the law) which kept us from doing that which was wrong. As such I believe society has a right to speak out against behavior it deems inappropriate or offensive provided it does not use the strong arm of the government to forcibly impose OUR WILL upon others. IMHO.
Get LOCAL 12 On Your Mobile Device
Get the LOCAL 12 app on your iPhone or your Android mobile phone.
Just open your QR barcode reader/scanner app on your phone, place the scanner over the appropriate image below and it will take you to download the app!

Android Phone app

Download LOCAL 12 Android app

iPhone app

Download LOCAL 12 app for iPhone

iPhone and iPod touch app
Catch the latest news, weather and sports on your iPhone or iPod touch with the Mobile Local News app.
WAP site
Our Web site is specially designed for all mobile phone users to read the latest news, sports, weather and even watch videos.
Stay connected on-the-go with our mobile Web site. It’s free
News Over Wireless
When you're on the go, take the news with you.
Get continually updated news, sports, entertainment, and weather - including maps, radar and Five-day forecasts - on your cell phone.
LOCAL 12
WKRC-TV
1906 Highland Avenue
Cincinnati, OH 45219
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.