Former Ben-Gal Says: No Evidence Of Sex With Teen Student

Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 7/17/2012 4:39 pm
A former Ben-gal and high school teacher charged with having sex with a student says there is no evidence it ever happened. 27 year-old Sarah Jones resigned from Dixie Heights High School last fall after those charges, and charges she sent inappropriate text messages to the student, were filed.

Jones went public for the first time Tuesday on a talk radio show with her attorney. Local 12 News Reporter Jeff Hirsh was there listening and later asking questions.

It was probably not too difficult for Eric Deters to get Sarah Jones on his radio show. He's her lawyer and her current employer. Their message: she's a victim of rumor and malicious high school gossip. No."

Deters says, "It's about letting everyone know out there she's not a whore or a slut or a bad person in society."

Jones' defense has a two-pronged strategy. The first is a motion to dismiss the sexual abuse charge, claiming there's no jurisdiction because there's no evidence sex happened anywhere, and if there's no evidence, there's no case. "Are you aware of a single live witness the police have who could corroborate any inappropriate relationship you had? No."

As for the text messages, there's a motion to suppress them, whatever they may say, and if they're not allowed, there's no case there either. However, Deters would not let his client answer a direct question - were you involved in any inappropriate physical or texting relationship with a student? "She's not gonna answer that. We have a trial strategy."

Deters said Jones will testify if their efforts to get the case tossed first don't work. He did offer a legally constructed comment. "As charged, she's not guilty of those charges."

Jones says, "I live day to day, 30 minutes to 30 minutes. I do know that I will be okay in the end."

Jones' mother, Cheryl Jones, a former school principal, is also charged with tampering with evidence in connection with her daughter's case. Cheryl Jones denies that charge, and Deters is asking that it be dismissed.
Share
46 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of WKRC-TV :: Cincinnati Weather and Forecasts, Cincinnati News, Breaking News, and Sports for the Cincinnati area, Ohio, northern Kentucky, Indiana, and the tristate area

Jim Schu - 7/18/2012 10:05 PM
0 Votes
Corndog, thank you for the civil discourse. (I was beginning to lose faith in humanity). 1. I am certainly no “expert” on these State laws. I am speaking primarily from a Constitutional perspective. 2. I do not claim to know more than “this scumbag hillbilly attorney”. 3. I do not pretend to know more than JaniceB (although I do question her comprehension skills). 4. In regards to your hypothetical question, I believe it is still a moral question and the teacher should still be terminated for violating the trust those parents placed in her. Had the State not muddied the waters with this stupid “age of consent” nonsense then this would clearly be a criminal case. I am strongly opposed to the State profiting from these cases. How can the State pretend to be concerned for the “victim” when all the fines, probation fees, court costs, etc. go straight into the State’s coffers? This is, of course, merely my humble opinion and a display of my total disdain for contradictory and hypocritical State laws.

Jim Schu - 7/18/2012 9:55 PM
0 Votes
Another insulting post from JaniceB, how sweet. “There is a provision under the Sexual Abuse Act where if it’s a person who exercises authority over an individual, in this case by it being a teacher the age of consent is raised to 18.” Thank you for proving my point. If you understood my argument you would understand that this is precisely why I’ve argued the State is not qualified to be our moral compass. Regarding making a fool of one’s self, please point me to my post where I claimed “teachers should legally be allowed to sexually exploit children”. Can you do that for me, Janice?

rosey red - 7/18/2012 9:52 PM
1 Vote
The law is very clear on this. The teacher, or preacher, or policeman is in a position of authority over anyone 18 years old or younger. Any sexual activity by either above mentioned party-is sexual abuse. Period!

Jim Schu - 7/18/2012 9:51 PM
0 Votes
NavRat, interesting approach claiming that “The law is clear”. Is it? You are correct to say “The student is still in the custody of his parents” which SHOULD make this a crime against the parent and NOT the child. Unfortunately, thanks to that CLEAR law you speak of, children that have reached the magical “age of consent” are viewed, by the STATE, as being of legal age to make sexual decisions. (Thus infringing upon parental rights AND nullifying any criminal activity of those they consensually have sex with). This CLEAR law creates another interesting dilemma. A pedophile, by definition, is one who engages in sex with a child (A child, by definition, is “A person not yet of legal age”). Therefore a pedophile can only be those that engage in sex (consensual or not) with those UNDER the State recognized (and LEGAL) age of consent! You speak of “Equal Protection Under the Law” and you demand that female teachers should be punished equally with male teachers while IGNORING THE FACT that the State has determined these children are of legal age to consent to sex. If only teachers are subject to this prosecution where is the EQUAL protection? You correctly point out the inconsistencies of the State when it comes to penalties for infractions between male and female violators YET you argue that these same imbeciles (the State) should have the authority to prosecute these cases! The State created this mess to begin with, with their stupid and arbitrary “age of consent” laws. You claim, “The laws are there for a reason, they need to be enforced”. Okay, WHICH Laws should we enforce? Clearly you ignore the laws that establish the age of consent. Clearly government is clueless and morally bankrupt.

CornDog - 7/18/2012 9:16 PM
0 Votes
@JaniceB and @Jim Schu, since you are experts and seem to believe you both know more than this scumbag hillbilly attorney - and each other - riddle me this: what if the dude says, and maybe he has, it was completely consensual and all of it happened away from school? Is it still a legal issue or simply a moral one?

JaniceB - 7/18/2012 9:04 PM
2 Votes
Jim Schu needs a clue. There is a provision under the Sexual Abuse Act where if it's a person who exercises authority over an individual, in this case by it being a teacher the age of consent is raised to 18. If you Googled the laws, and had sense; you wouldn't have made such a fool of yourself. I think it is sick that you think that teachers should legally be allowed to sexually exploit children under 18.

navrat - 7/18/2012 8:43 PM
1 Vote
I know that a Northern Kentucky male teacher just got about 7 years in jail for having a consensual affair with a 17 year old senior girl. Everybody knows that teenage girls are much more mature than boys of the same age. So why do male teachers consistently get the book thrown at them while females get a slap on the wrist. The law is clear. A teacher can not have sex with a student. The student is still in the custody of his parents. The line has been drawn for years. Why do these pedophile defenders want to move it? Anybody ever hear of "Equal Protection Under the Law"? This is actually a form of discrimination against female students. If she (who is generally much more mature than a boy of the same age) tries to have an affair with one of her teachers , it will be much more difficult for her because of the stiff penalties given to male teachers. A boy on the other hand will have much greater opportunities to do the same because female teachers only get a slap on the wrist. Mothers get no help from the State in protecting their boys from the female pedophiles while Fathers get all the help in the world in nailing male pedophiles to the cross. If one of these female pedophiles get pregnant by one of her too young to consent victims ,he becomes her wage slave for 18 years. What a great way to start out life. The laws are there for a reason ,they need to be enforced. I cant buy the premise that female pefophilia is ok,while male pedophilia is terrible. Its all terrible!

Jim Schu - 7/18/2012 7:35 PM
0 Votes
JaniceB, certainly one of us needs to “get an education and a clue”. 1. “The age of consent depends on circumstances”… WHAT? 2. “For instance in some cases age of consent can be higher… “ So the age of consent is a sliding variable? 3. “… if the perpetrator is an authority figure that has control over the prey”. First of all, the “perpetrator” has, so far, merely been ACCUSED. Secondly, what you term “prey” is actually a 17-year-old young man that (if anything DID happen) apparently coalesced willingly and knowingly (if not being the perpetrator himself). Being as he was over the age of consent I don’t see how their actions are any of my, your or the government’s business. For the record, I personally loathe the “age of consent” law as a violation of parental rights. Be that as it is, I find it morally reprehensible and hypocritical to arbitrary enforce said law. We do agree that people in authority must maintain the trust placed in them. If, in fact, she has violated that trust I believe the school board should (must) terminate her contract. Her crime is ethical NOT criminal! 4. “It should be a crime for our taxpayer money to be used for teachers to exploit our children sexually”. Please tell me how much of our taxes were used for Ms. Jones to exploit a child. 5. “I think that teachers that exploit their position to victimize children… “. At the risk of sounding redundant, she did not victimize a “child” as the young man was clearly over the age of consent. Please tell me what “damages” the victim sustained. I mean, did he lose his virginity or did he require medical aid? 6. “… should be prosecuted… “. Is it a crime for an 85-year-old to have sex with an 18-year-old? (Or, for that matter, with one over the age of consent?) THERE IS NO CRIME HERE! 7. “… and barred from public service”. If guilty, we agree.

JaniceB - 7/18/2012 5:44 PM
3 Votes
Sarah Jones is behaving guilty. If she was innocent, I doubt she would be trying to suppress evidence. She is behaving like Bill Clinton. What next, are they going to argue that oral sex is not sex? Even if the relationship hadn't reached the physical stage, I suspect that the text messages are going to indicate that there was an inappropriate sexual relationship. I suspect in part, she was trying to seduce the student. If she was innocent, why the resignation, why was there an alleged attempt to destroy evidence, why the attempt to suppress evidence?

JaniceB - 7/18/2012 5:17 PM
3 Votes
Jim Schu you need to get an education and a clue. The age of consent depends on circumstances. For instance in some cases age of consent can be higher, if the perpetrator is an authority figure that has control over the prey. It should be a crime for our taxpayer money to be used for teachers to exploit our children sexually. I think that teachers that exploit their position to victimize children should be prosecuted and barred from public service. Teachers should not be sexual predators.
Upcoming Sponsored Events
Donate Through Flowers to the Coalition for a Drug-Free Greater Cincinnati
The Coalition for a Drug-Free Greater Cincinnati and Jones the Florist have teamed up in May
A.J. Green Football ProCamp
Join Cincinnati Pro Bowl Wide Receiver A.J. Green for football instruction and fun
Hunger Walk & 5K Run
Monday, May 27th, benefiting the Freestore Foodbank
JDRF Kings Island Walk to Cure Diabetes
June 1, 2013
Great Strides - Cystic Fibrosis Fundation Walk
May 31 in Blue Ash, June 1, England Idlewood Park, June 8, College of Mount St. Joseph
Rockin' Ribs On The River
Saturday, June 1st
Racing to Read 5k Run & Walk
Saturday, June 8
Ride Cincinnati For Breast Cancer Research
June 9th
Ride With JDRF In 2013
Ride to Cure schedule for 2013
Fighting Hunger Together
Vote for Cincinnati community to receive $1 million dollars to fight hunger
Greater Cincinnati Behavioral Health Services
Skilled and caring professionals treat clients with compassion, patience and dignity as they provide the individualized services needed. We can address our clients’ housing, psychiatric, medication, vocational, social and other support needs. Video Video
Power Pack Program
Nutritious food for children to take home each weekend from school
Get the LOCAL 12 app on your iPhone or your Android mobile phone.
Just open your QR barcode reader/scanner app on your phone, place the scanner over the appropriate image below and it will take you to download the app!

Android Phone app

Download LOCAL 12 Android app

iPhone app

Download LOCAL 12 app for iPhone

Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.