NFL: Final Call of Packers-Seahawks Game Will Stand

 Monday Night Football Controversial Call, Packers vs Seahawks
Monday Night Football Controversial Call, Packers vs Seahawks
Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 9/25/2012 12:28 pm
The NFL says a controversial call on a play during the Monday Night Football game between the Seattle Seahawks and the Green Bay Packers will stand undisputed.

Russell Wilson threw a disputed 24-yard touchdown to Golden Tate on the final play of the game, and the Seattle Seahawks rallied to beat the Green Bay Packers 14-12 in the controversial ending.

Wilson scrambled from the pocket and threw to the corner of the end zone as the clock expired. Tate shoved Green Bay's Sam Shields out of the way, then wrestled with M.D. Jennings for possession. It was ruled on the field as a touchdown and after a lengthy review, referee Wayne Elliott came out from under the hood and announced "the ruling on the field stands" and CenturyLink Field erupted in celebration.

Both teams left the field before being brought back out to attempt the point after touchdown. The delay was nearly 10 minutes.
 
On Tuesday morning, the NFL stood by the decision and released a lengthy statement, which reads:

"In Monday’s game between the Green Bay Packers and Seattle Seahawks, Seattle faced a 4th-and-10 from the Green Bay 24 with eight seconds remaining in the game.

Seattle quarterback Russell Wilson threw a pass into the end zone. Several players, including Seattle wide receiver Golden Tate and Green Bay safety M.D. Jennings, jumped into the air in an attempt to catch the ball.

While the ball is in the air, Tate can be seen shoving Green Bay cornerback Sam Shields to the ground. This should have been a penalty for offensive pass interference, which would have ended the game. It was not called and is not reviewable in instant replay.

When the players hit the ground in the end zone, the officials determined that both Tate and Jennings had possession of the ball. Under the rule for simultaneous catch, the ball belongs to Tate, the offensive player. The result of the play was a touchdown.

Replay Official Howard Slavin stopped the game for an instant replay review. The aspects of the play that were reviewable included if the ball hit the ground and who had possession of the ball. In the end zone, a ruling of a simultaneous catch is reviewable. That is not the case in the field of play, only in the end zone.

Referee Wayne Elliott determined that no indisputable visual evidence existed to overturn the call on the field, and as a result, the on-field ruling of touchdown stood. The NFL Officiating Department reviewed the video today and supports the decision not to overturn the on-field ruling following the instant replay review.

The result of the game is final.

Applicable rules to the play are as follows:

A player (or players) jumping in the air has not legally gained possession of the ball until he satisfies the elements of a catch listed here.

Rule 8, Section 1, Article 3 of the NFL Rule Book defines a catch: A forward pass is complete (by the offense) or intercepted (by the defense) if a player, who is inbounds: (a) secures control of the ball in his hands or arms prior to the ball touching the ground; and (b) touches the ground inbounds with both feet or with any part of his body other than his hands; and (c) maintains control of the ball long enough, after (a) and (b) have been fulfilled, to enable him to perform any act common to the game (i.e., maintaining control long enough to pitch it, pass it, advance with it, or avoid or ward off an opponent, etc.).

When a player (or players) is going to the ground in the attempt to catch a pass, Rule 8, Section 1, Article 3, Item 1 states: Player Going to the Ground. If a player goes to the ground in the act of catching a pass (with or without contact by an opponent), he must maintain control of the ball throughout the process of contacting the ground, whether in the field of play or the end zone. If he loses control of the ball, and the ball touches the ground before he regains control, the pass is incomplete. If he regains control prior to the ball touching the ground, the pass is complete.

Rule 8, Section 1, Article 3, Item 5 states: Simultaneous Catch. If a pass is caught simultaneously by two eligible opponents, and both players retain it, the ball belongs to the passers. It is not a simultaneous catch if a player gains control first and an opponent subsequently gains joint control. If the ball is muffed after simultaneous touching by two such players, all the players of the passing team become eligible to catch the loose ball.
Share
14 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of WKRC-TV :: Cincinnati Weather and Forecasts, Cincinnati News, Breaking News, and Sports for the Cincinnati area, Ohio, northern Kentucky, Indiana, and the tristate area

Florenceyall39 - 9/25/2012 9:25 PM
1 Vote
I SMELL BULLSH*T!!!

cptn spaulding - 9/25/2012 9:11 PM
0 Votes
You are missing simultaneous posession. Sure, the defender had more of the ball, but the reciever also had the ball. If Jennings would have knocked the ball down, tipped it backwards, something other than attempting to pad his own stats with an interception, this never would have happened. I also have to wonder out loud that if this was flipped, and the NFL darlings Packers would have been on offense and the call went their way, would this even be a big deal?

tcates - 9/25/2012 6:18 PM
0 Votes
The thing that kills me about this is that the league reviewed it and they agree as well. What am I missing here?

say21wut - 9/25/2012 5:30 PM
2 Votes
After further review, I think the something isn't right. The non-scab referee in the booth had more than one view that clearly showed the ball was intercepted. Thinking the on-field referees picket line may be at a Vegas casino. Someone made out like a bandit on this one.

Economystic - 9/25/2012 4:31 PM
1 Vote
And write to the advertisers directly: GMC: GMC: http://www.gmc.com/h...contact-us.html Proctor & Gamble:http://pg.custhelp.com/app/ask McDonald's: McDonalds:http://www.mcdonalds...dvertising.html

Economystic - 9/25/2012 4:28 PM
0 Votes
I think a write in campaign would be more effective. fans should write in to owners to resolve the strike and get the permanent ref back to work. As you can see it isn't fair to the teams when the ref's make bad calls. the way to make the owners take it serious is to pledge to boycott advertisers. That is where the money comes from. They get more in one commercial break that the whole games ticket sales even if they have a sellout. So Chevy, McDonald's, Budweiser, P&G look out! Word is already getting around: http://boards.philadelphiaeagles.com/topic/650941-refs-boycott-nfl-advertisers/ ompanies to boycott until the NFL signs the refs: GMC Trucks, New Era, Proctor and Gamble (Tide), McDonald's, DirecTv, Nike, Budweiser (Anheuser-Busch), Craftsman, Pepsi, Toyota / Lexus...

Maggie22 - 9/25/2012 3:10 PM
3 Votes
This was not a simultaneous catch. Awful call that should have been reversed on review.

W Trent - 9/25/2012 2:15 PM
2 Votes
One way to get the NFL off their bottoms and to settle is stop watching, buying NFL Stuff, and going to games. Hit them in the pocketbooks and they will do something. I think the strick & lockout are wrong, but enough of this stuff from players, coaches, owners, and most of all the NFL!

Ammys2Cuties - 9/25/2012 11:34 AM
1 Vote
Hey!...isn't there even a 'learning curve'? LOL!

Sebastian - 9/25/2012 9:42 AM
3 Votes
thats why the bengals are not 0-3...bad calls
Sports Alerts

Signup to receive sports emails:
-Bengals Nation news
-Breaking sports stories
-High School football updates

Register Here
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.